The energy cost of women walking and running in shoes and boots∗
- 1 March 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Ergonomics
- Vol. 29 (3) , 439-443
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00140138608968277
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the difference in energy cost for women walking and running in shoes versus heavier boots. Seven subjects wore athletic shoes (mean weight = 514 ± 50g) and leather military boots (mean weight = 1371 ± 104g) at three walking speeds (4·0, 5·6 and 7·3km/hour) and two running speeds (8middot;9 and 10·5 km/hour). During each walking and running trial oxygen uptake ([Vdot]O2 ml kg−1 min−1) was measured. The [Vdot]O2 for women wearing boots were significantly higher (P < 0·05) than for shoes for both walking and running, with the exception of the slowest walking speed. The average increment in energy cost was 1·0% per 100-g increase in weight per pair of footwear. These results are similar to those reported for men from other studies which found increments in energy cost of 0·7 to 0·9% per 100-g increase in weight of footwear.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Energy cost of backpacking in heavy bootsErgonomics, 1986
- The energy cost and heart-rate response of trained and untrained subjects walking and running in shoes and bootsErgonomics, 1984
- Oxygen cost of running in trained and untrained men and womenMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 1977
- Individual variations in the energy expenditure of standardized activitiesThe Journal of Physiology, 1958
- THE PHYSIOLOGICAL MEANING OF THE MAXIMAL OXYGEN INTAKE TEST1Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1958
- The expenditure of energy by men and women walkingThe Journal of Physiology, 1957