The psychological aftermath of prostate cancer treatment choices: a comparison of depression, anxiety and quality of life outcomes over the 12 months following diagnosis
- 6 April 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by AMPCo in The Medical Journal of Australia
- Vol. 190 (S7) , S86-S89
- https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2009.tb02477.x
Abstract
Objective: To assess the psychological impact of the different treatments for localised prostate cancer (PCA). Design, participants and setting: Observational, prospective study of consecutive patients with PCA attending clinics in public hospitals and private practices in metropolitan Melbourne between 1 April 2001 and 30 December 2005. Data were collected at initial diagnosis of histologically confirmed localised PCA, and close to the commencement of definitive treatment (Time 1), and 12 months later (Time 2). Patients were stratified according to treatment type (radical prostatectomy [RP], hormone therapy [HT] or other early treatment including radiation therapies [OET]). Patients who elected to undergo active surveillance/watchful waiting (WW) rather than active treatment were treated as a naturalistic control group. Main outcome measures: Levels of depression and anxiety were assessed by the Brief Symptom Inventory, and physical and psychosocial aspects of health‐related quality of life (HRQOL) were assessed by the 36‐item Short‐Form Health Survey. Results: 211 patients with PCA were recruited; 193 completed the Time 1 questionnaires (38 RP, 56 HT, 38 OET and 61 WW); and 172 completed the Time 2 questionnaires (33 RP, 51 HT, 33 OET and 55 WW). At Time 1, the three active treatment groups all reported greater dysfunction in work role and daily activities compared with the WW group. The RP group also reported worse social and emotional role functioning, while the HT and OET groups reported poorer vitality levels. The HT group reported significantly higher depression scores. At Time 2, the RP and OET groups did not differ from the WW group on either HRQOL or psychological status. By contrast, the HT group reported significantly worse HRQOL (physical functioning, role‐physical and vitality domains) and greater psychological distress compared with the WW group. Conclusions: Compared with the other active treatments for localised PCA, HT appears to be associated with poorer HRQOL and greater psychological distress 12 months after commencing treatment.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Health and Medical Research Council
- Bethlehem Griffiths Research Foundation
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Case 15-2008New England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- Psychosocial Adjustment in Newly Diagnosed Prostate CancerAustralian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 2008
- The effects of prostate cancer on intimate relationshipsThe Journal of Men's Health & Gender, 2007
- Psychological adjustment of men with prostate cancer: a review of the literatureBioPsychoSocial Medicine, 2006
- Clinically localised prostate cancerBMJ, 2006
- The psychosocial impact of prostate cancer on patients and their partnersThe Medical Journal of Australia, 2006
- Health‐related quality of life and satisfaction with care among older men treated for prostate cancer with either radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapyBJU International, 2006
- Impact of hormonal therapy prior to radical prostatectomy on the recovery of quality of lifeInternational Journal of Urology, 2005
- The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Medical Care, 1993
- The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Medical Care, 1992