Paradigmatic Choices in Evaluation Methodology
- 1 October 1980
- journal article
- other
- Published by SAGE Publications in Evaluation Review
- Vol. 4 (5) , 693-712
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841x8000400510
Abstract
Some writers state that experimental research mustform the core of all evaluation. Others counter that experrmental studies tend not to be used, and urge reliance on more subjective and process-oriented research methods. If we accept the premise that the "hard-science" and "anthropological" approaches are truly paradigms of evaluatron research, the resultant issue is which approach to use m specific cases. The present report rejects the "competing paradigms" thesis, and argues that there is a solid middle ground. It suggests why that ground should be used, and considers how the two approaches can be mixed to surt particular research settings .Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- On the Role of Values in Program EvaluationEvaluation Quarterly, 1978
- Decision Makers' JudgmentsEvaluation Quarterly, 1978
- Psychological Assumptions, Experimentation, and Real World ProblemsEvaluation Quarterly, 1978
- Evaluating Social InterventionsEvaluation Quarterly, 1977
- Making the Case for Randomized Assignment to Treatments by Considering the Alternatives: Six Ways in Which Quasi-Experimental Evaluations In Compensatory Education Tend to Underestimate EffectsPublished by Elsevier ,1975
- Sociological Analysis and the "Variable"American Sociological Review, 1956