Screening, Assessment, and Referral Practices in Adult Correctional Settings
- 1 September 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Criminal Justice and Behavior
- Vol. 34 (9) , 1216-1234
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854807304431
Abstract
The use of screening and assessment tools to gauge substance abuse disorders and the risk for recidivism are two widely recommended practices. A national survey of adult prisons, jails, and community correctional agencies was conducted to examine the practices used to place offenders in appropriate treatment services. Study findings indicate that 58.2% of the surveyed respondents report the use of a standardized substance abuse-screening tool, and that 34.2% use an actuarial risk tool. The provision of higher intensity treatment programs, the use of standardized risk tools, and the provision of more community referral services were all independently associated with the use of a standardized substance abuse-screening tool. Because practices vary considerably, agencies desiring to improve correctional programming should consider different dissemination, implementation, and technology transfer strategies.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Social Functioning, Treatment Dropout, and Recidivism of Probationers Mandated to a Modified Therapeutic CommunityCriminal Justice and Behavior, 2006
- The Recent Past and Near Future of Risk and/or Need AssessmentCrime & Delinquency, 2006
- Secondary Prevention Services for Clients Who Are Low Risk in Drug Court: A Conceptual ModelCrime & Delinquency, 2006
- Estimating drug treatment needs among state prison inmatesDrug and Alcohol Dependence, 2005
- Residential substance abuse treatment for state prisonersPublished by American Psychological Association (APA) ,2003
- Offender Risk AssessmentCriminal Justice and Behavior, 2002
- Putting the “What Works” Research into PracticeCriminal Justice and Behavior, 2002
- Barriers to Implementing Effective Correctional Drug Treatment ProgramsThe Prison Journal, 1999
- Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical–statistical controversy.Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 1996
- Prediction and Classification in Criminal Justice Decision MakingCrime and Justice, 1987