Patient Selection for Biventricular Pacing
- 19 January 2002
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
- Vol. 13 (S1) , S63-S67
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8167.2002.tb01956.x
Abstract
Biventricular Pacing. Introduction: Biventricular pacing improves functional status in the majority of patients with drug‐refractory heart failure, dilated cardiomyopathy, and interventricular conduction delay. The aim of this study was to analyze the baseline clinical and functional data of a cohort of patients implanted with a biventricular stimulation system in a single‐center experience, to verify if the pathophysiologic characteristics of patients affect outcome, and to determine if preliminary identification of the right candidates for the new therapy is possible with noninvasive parameters. Methods and Results: Since March 1999, 52 patients with advanced heart failure (idiopathic cardiomyopathy 50%, ischemic cardiomyopathy 35%, other etiology 15%) and left bundle branch block underwent cardiac resynchronization and were followed prospectively. Paired analysis over mean (± SD) follow‐up of 348 ± 154 days showed an overall significant decrease of QRS width (baseline 194 ± 33.2 msec vs follow‐up 159.6 ± 20.1 msec), New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class (baseline 3.2 ± 0.5 vs follow‐up 2.3 ± 0.5), quality‐of‐life score (baseline 54 ± 25 vs follow‐up 25 ± 16), and increase of maximal VO2 (baseline 12.6 ± 2.5 mL/kg/min vs follow‐up 15.0 ± 3.3 mL/kg/min). There were 80% responders (documented, persistent decrease ≥1 NYHA class) and 20% nonresponders (same NYHA class or decline of status; need for heart transplant; death due to progressive pump failure). No significant differences in baseline clinical and functional variables between the two subgroups were observed. In responders, there was a highly significant global improvement of all variables; in nonresponders, no parameters changed between baseline and follow‐up. Conclusion: These data confirm the role of biventricular pacing in improving the functional status of the great majority of a selected patient population having advanced heart failure and left bundle branch block with wide QRS complex. Basal demographic, clinical, and functional characteristics are not helpful in preliminary selection of responders. Simple evaluation of NYHA class confirms favorable outcome (improvement of functional and hemodynamic status).Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of Multisite Biventricular Pacing in Patients with Heart Failure and Intraventricular Conduction DelayNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Intermediate‐Term Results of Biventricular Pacing in Heart Failure: Correlation Between Clinical and Hemodynamic DataPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 2000
- Predictors of Systolic Augmentation From Left Ventricular Preexcitation in Patients With Dilated Cardiomyopathy and Intraventricular Conduction DelayCirculation, 2000
- Effect of Pacing Chamber and Atrioventricular Delay on Acute Systolic Function of Paced Patients With Congestive Heart FailureCirculation, 1999
- Improved Left Ventricular Mechanics From Acute VDD Pacing in Patients With Dilated Cardiomyopathy and Ventricular Conduction DelayCirculation, 1999
- The pacing therapies for congestive heart failure (PATH-CHF) study: rationale, design, and endpoints of a prospective randomized multicenter study11For a complete list of institutions and individuals participating in the PATH-CHF Study Group, see the Appendix.The American Journal of Cardiology, 1999
- Acute hemodynamic effects of biventricular DDD pacing in patients with end-stage heart failureJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1998
- Multisite Pacing as a Supplemental Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure: Preliminary Results of the Medtronic Inc. InSync StudyPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1998