Coupons and private labels: A cross‐category analysis of grocery products
- 1 November 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Psychology & Marketing
- Vol. 9 (6) , 487-500
- https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.4220090606
Abstract
This article examines the influence of coupons on private label shares of grocery products. The impact of national brand and private label coupons, distributed by manufacturers and retailers, is examined. A consumer framework and a typology of coupon effects are developed to explain different types of coupon usage behavior. Aggregate scanner panel data on 480 product categories are used in the analysis. Both the type of coupon and the method of distribution (by manufacturer or by retailer) are found to be important determinants of private label share response. Couponing activities by the national brand manufacturer are negatively related to private label share, thus indicating that they may be effective deterrents of private label penetration. However, couponing activities related to private labels do not help increase private label shares. The surprising finding is that national brand store couponing activity is positively related to private label share.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Price-Induced Patterns of CompetitionMarketing Science, 1989
- Measuring the Effect of Retail Store Promotions on Brand and Store SubstitutionJournal of Marketing Research, 1988
- The Effects of a Direct Mail Coupon on Brand Choice BehaviorJournal of Marketing Research, 1987
- Consumer Promotions and the Acceleration of Product PurchasesMarketing Science, 1985
- A Price Discrimination Theory of CouponsMarketing Science, 1984
- A Model for Evaluating the Profitability of Coupon PromotionsMarketing Science, 1983
- Regression DiagnosticsPublished by Wiley ,1980
- The Impact of Advertising on the Price of Consumer ProductsJournal of Marketing, 1980
- The Impact of Advertising on the Price of Consumer ProductsJournal of Marketing, 1980
- The New World of Private BrandsCalifornia Management Review, 1966