Subjective and Objective Response to Single- Versus Dual-Chamber Pacing
- 1 December 1987
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
- Vol. 1 (4) , 343-348
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8167.1987.tb01423.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hemodynamic comparison of ventricular pacing, atrioventricular sequential pacing, and atrial synchronous ventricular pacing using radionuclide ventriculographyThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1986
- Physiological Versus Single-Rate Ventricular Pacing: A Double-Blind Cross-Over StudyPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1985
- Doppler ultrasound measurement of cardiac output in patients with physiologic pacemakersThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1984
- Randomised controlled trial of physiological and ventricular pacing.Heart, 1983
- Atrial Synchronized Ventricular Pacing: Contribution of the Chronotropic Response to Improved Exercise PerformancePacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1983
- Comparison of Resting Hemodynamic Indices and Exercise Performance During Atrial Synchronized and Asynchronous Ventricular PacingPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1983
- Left Ventricular Volumes with Ventricular Inhibited and Atrial Triggered Ventricular PacingActa Medica Scandinavica, 1983
- A comparison of the acute and long-term hemodynamic effects of ventricular inhibited and atrial synchronous ventricular inhibited pacing.Circulation, 1982