Routine CrossâMatching is not Necessary for a Transurethral Resection of the Prostate
- 1 April 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Urology
- Vol. 56  (2) , 198-201
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.1984.tb05360.x
Abstract
Summaryâ Two hundred and fiftyâfive consecutive patients undergoing transurethral prostatectomy were studied prospectively to test a policy of not routinely crossâmatching blood. Blood was ordered only for patients with anaemia, a major medical risk factor, a prostate gland estimated to be greater than 60 g, or the presence of red cell alloantibodies. Of the 203 patients who were âgrouped and savedâ only, 30 (12%) were subsequently crossâmatched and 22 (8.5%) transfused. There were no significant problems as a result of the operation of this policy. The value of these preâoperative criteria for crossâmatching was confirmed, apart from the clinical estimation of prostatic size. The use of such a policy cauld be of significant value to the hospital blood transfusion services.This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Use of blood in elective general surgery: an area of wasted resources.BMJ, 1983
- Optimal Blood Use in Genitourinary SurgeryJournal of Urology, 1981
- Is routine crossmatching for two units of blood necessary in elective surgery?The American Journal of Surgery, 1981
- Accuracy in Preoperative Estimation of Prostatic SizeScandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, 1981
- Hemotherapy in Elective Surgery: An Incidence Report, Review of the Literature, and Alternatives for Guideline AppraisalAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1980
- Use of blood in elective surgeryJAMA, 1980
- INCIDENCE AND SEVERITY OF ANAPHYLACTOID REACTIONS TO COLLOID VOLUME SUBSTITUTESPublished by Elsevier ,1977