The Angoff Cutoff Score Method: The Impact of Frame-of-Reference Rater Training
- 1 December 1991
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Educational and Psychological Measurement
- Vol. 51 (4) , 857-872
- https://doi.org/10.1177/001316449105100406
Abstract
One of the most preferred and widely used methods for generating cutoff scores in content-related validity situations is the Angoff procedure. This procedure, however, typically displays low inter-rater reliability. Very little is known about the accuracy of the cutoff scores. The present study compares the effect of two frame-of-reference rater training approaches on the reliability and accuracy of cutoff scores generated by the Angoff procedure. Results indicate that both frame-of-reference rater training strategies resulted in significantly higher levels of interrater reliability and more accurate decisions than a non-frame-of-reference condition.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- FROM LABORATORY TO PRACTICE: NEGLECTED ISSUES IN IMPLEMENTING FRAME-OF-REFERENCE RATER TRAININGPersonnel Psychology, 1989
- SETTING CUTOFF SCORES: LEGAL, PSYCHOMETRIC, AND PROFESSIONAL ISSUES AND GUIDELINESPersonnel Psychology, 1988
- Effect of rater training on rater accuracy: Levels-of-processing theory and social facilitation theory perspectives.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1987
- A Consumer’s Guide to Setting Performance Standards on Criterion-Referenced TestsReview of Educational Research, 1986
- A COMPARISON OF THREE METHODS FOR ESTABLISHING MINIMUM STANDARDS ON THE NATIONAL TEACHER EXAMINATIONSJournal of Educational Measurement, 1984
- Accuracy of performance ratings as affected by rater training and perceived purpose of rating.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1984
- Minimum Competency Standards Set by Three Divergent Groups of Raters Using Three Judgmental Procedures: Implications for ValidityEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1983
- Angoff and Nedelsky Standard Setting Procedures: Implications for the Validity of Proficiency Test Score InterpretationEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1982
- A Comparison of the Nedelsky and Angoff Cutting Score Procedures Using Generalizability TheoryApplied Psychological Measurement, 1980
- STANDARDS AND CRITERIAJournal of Educational Measurement, 1978