A comparison of orally administered misoprostol to intravenous oxytocin for labor induction in women with favorable cervical examinations

This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:

• A randomized comparison of oral and intravaginal misoprostol for labor induction
  Published by Wolters Kluwer Health ,2000
• A comparison of orally administered misoprostol with vaginally administered misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction
  American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1999
• Oral or vaginal misoprostol administration for induction of labor: a randomized, double-blind trial
  Published by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1998
• A masked randomized comparison of oral and vaginal administration of misoprostol for labor induction*1
  Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1998
• Oral administration of misoprostol for labor induction: A randomized controlled trial
  Published by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1998
• Induction of labor in the nineties: Conquering the unfavorable cervix
  Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1997
• Oral or vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor
  International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 1997
• Initiation of labor with a moderately favorable cervix: a comparison between prostaglandin E₂ gel and oxytocin
  International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 1989
• Failed Induction of Labour
  Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1985
• Single application of prostaglandin e2in a viscous gel for induction of labor at term in patients with favorable cervix
  Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1981