A comparison of orally administered misoprostol with vaginally administered misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction
- 1 May 1999
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 180 (5) , 1155-1160
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70610-1
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- A masked randomized comparison of oral and vaginal administration of misoprostol for labor induction*1Published by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1998
- Oral administration of misoprostol for labor induction: A randomized controlled trialPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1998
- A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of misoprostol with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor inductionAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1997
- Induction of labor in the nineties: Conquering the unfavorable cervixObstetrics & Gynecology, 1997
- Misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction: A meta-analysisObstetrics & Gynecology, 1997
- Oral or vaginal misoprostol for induction of laborInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 1997
- Vaginal Misoprostol for Induction of Labor: A Randomized Controlled TrialObstetrics & Gynecology, 1996
- Cervical priming with oral misoprostol in pre-labor rupture of membranes at termObstetrics & Gynecology, 1996
- Misoprostol: An effective agent for cervical ripening and labor inductionAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1995
- Observations on heart rate and pH in the human fetus during laborAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1969