Differential Dimethyl Labeling of N-Termini of Peptides after Guanidination for Proteome Analysis
- 5 November 2005
- journal article
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Journal of Proteome Research
- Vol. 4 (6) , 2099-2108
- https://doi.org/10.1021/pr050215d
Abstract
We describe an enabling technique for proteome analysis based on isotope-differential dimethyl labeling of N-termini of tryptic peptides followed by microbore liquid chromatography (LC) matrix-assisted laser desorption and ionization (MALDI) mass spectrometry (MS). In this method, lysine side chains are blocked by guanidination to prevent the incorporation of multiple labels, followed by N-terminal labeling via reductive amination using d(0),(12)C-formaldehyde or d(2),(13)C-formaldehyde. Relative quantification of peptide mixtures is achieved by examining the MALDI mass spectra of the peptide pairs labeled with different isotope tags. A nominal mass difference of 6 Da between the peptide pair allows negligible interference between the two isotopic clusters for quantification of peptides of up to 3000 Da. Since only the N-termini of tryptic peptides are differentially labeled and the a(1) ions are also enhanced in the MALDI MS/MS spectra, interpretation of the fragment ion spectra to obtain sequence information is greatly simplified. It is demonstrated that this technique of N-terminal dimethylation (2ME) after lysine guanidination (GA) or 2MEGA offers several desirable features, including simple experimental procedure, stable products, using inexpensive and commercially available reagents, and negligible isotope effect on reversed-phase separation. LC-MALDI MS combined with this 2MEGA labeling technique was successfully used to identify proteins that included polymorphic variants and low abundance proteins in bovine milk. In addition, by analyzing a mixture of two equal amounts of milk whey fraction as a control, it is shown that the measured average ratio for 56 peptide pairs from 14 different proteins is 1.02, which is very close to the theoretical ratio of 1.00. The calculated percentage error is 2.0% and relative standard deviation is 4.6%.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Direct MS/MS Analysis of Proteins Blotted on Membranes by a Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization-Quadrupole Ion Trap-Time-of-Flight Tandem Mass SpectrometerJournal of Proteome Research, 2005
- Enhancing TOF/TOF-based de Novo Sequencing Capability for High Throughput Protein Identification with Amino Acid-Coded Mass TaggingJournal of Proteome Research, 2004
- Two-Dimensional Mass Spectra Generated from the Analysis of 15N-Labeled and Unlabeled Peptides for Efficient Protein Identification and de novo Peptide SequencingJournal of Proteome Research, 2004
- N-Terminal Isotope Tagging Strategy for Quantitative Proteomics: Results-Driven Analysis of Protein Abundance ChangesAnalytical Chemistry, 2004
- Proteomic analysis of κ‐casein micro‐heterogeneityProteomics, 2004
- De novo peptide sequencing and quantitative profiling of complex protein mixtures using mass-coded abundance taggingNature Biotechnology, 2002
- 18O Labeling: a tool for proteomicsRapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 2001
- Automatedde novo sequencing of proteins using the differential scanning techniqueProteomics, 2001
- C-Terminal Sequence Analysis of Peptides and Proteins Using Carboxypeptidases and Mass Spectrometry after Derivatization of Lys and Cys ResiduesAnalytical Chemistry, 1997
- Protease‐catalyzed incorporation of 18O into peptide fragments and its application for protein sequencing by electrospray and matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometryElectrophoresis, 1996