Towards a feasible model for shared decision making: focus group study with general practice registrars
- 18 September 1999
- Vol. 319 (7212) , 753-756
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.319.7212.753
Abstract
Objectives: To explore the views of general practice registrars about involving patients in decisions and to assess the feasibility of using the shared decision making model by means of simulated general practice consultations. Design: Qualitative study based on focus group interviews. Setting: General practice vocational training schemes in south Wales. Participants: 39 general practice registrars and eight course organisers (acting as observers) attended four sessions; three simulated patients attended each time. Method: After an introduction to the principles and suggested stages of shared decision making the registrars conducted and observed a series of consultations about choices of treatment with simulated patients using verbal, numerical, and graphical data formats. Reactions were elicited by using focus group interviews after each consultation and content analysis undertaken. Results: Registrars in general practice report not being trained in the skills required to involve patients in clinical decisions. They had a wide range of opinions about “involving patients in decisions,” ranging from protective paternalism (“doctor knows best”), through enlightened self interest (lightening the load), to the potential rewards of a more egalitarian relationship with patients. The work points to three contextual precursors for the process: the availability of reliable information, appropriate timing of the decision making process, and the readiness of patients to accept an active role in their own management. Conclusions: Sharing decisions entails sharing the uncertainties about the outcomes of medical processes and involves exposing the fact that data are often unavailable or not known; this can cause anxiety to both patient and clinician. Movement towards further patient involvement will depend on both the skills and the attitudes of professionals, and this work shows the steps that need to be taken if further progress is to be made in this direction. Involvement of patients in decisions about their treatment or care is increasingly advocated Registrars in general practice report not receiving training in the skills needed for successful involvement of patients in decision making Attitudes towards involving patients range from being highly positive to being more circumspect Moves towards enhancing patient involvement in decision making will depend on developing both skills and attitudes of professionalsKeywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Doctor-patient communication: A review of the literaturePublished by Elsevier ,2000
- General practice registrar responses to the use of different risk communication tools in simulated consultations: a focus group studyBMJ, 1999
- When is a shared decision not (quite) a shared decision? Negotiating preferences in a general practice encounterSocial Science & Medicine, 1999
- Shared decision-making in primary care: the neglected second half of the consultation.1999
- Is ‘shared decision‐making’ feasible in consultations for upper respiratory tract infections? Assessing the influence of antibiotic expectations using discourse analysisHealth Expectations, 1999
- Some Issues Arising in the Systematic Analysis of Focus Group MaterialsPublished by SAGE Publications ,1999
- Communication about risk: diversity among primary care professionalsFamily Practice, 1998
- All changed, changed utterlyBMJ, 1998
- Partnership with patientsBMJ, 1998
- Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango)Social Science & Medicine, 1997