Critical realism and realist research in human geography: a method or a philosophy in search of a method?
- 1 February 1997
- journal article
- review article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Progress in Human Geography
- Vol. 21 (1) , 51-74
- https://doi.org/10.1191/030913297668207944
Abstract
Recent philosophical debates in human geography tend to misappropriate critical realism as a method per se. Drawing upon an extensive review of the realist philosophy and method in social science, this article argues that critical realism is a philosophy in search of a method. It first delves into recent debates about critical realism within the wider geographical discourse. It then suggests three useful guidelines in executing realist research in human geography: iterative abstraction, qualified grounded theory method and methodological triangulation. The article ends with a detailed empirical example for the readers to work through of the ways in which realist research can be practised in human geography.This publication has 51 references indexed in Scilit:
- Attracting foreign investment? The role of investment incentives in the ASEAN operations of transnational corporationsThe Pacific Review, 1996
- Third World multinationals revisited: A research critique and future agendaThird World Quarterly, 1994
- Gender Issues in the Use of Interviewing as a Research Method∗The Professional Geographer, 1993
- Personal Narratives as Interactive Texts: Collecting and Interpreting Migrant Life-Histories∗The Professional Geographer, 1993
- Valid Games? A Response to Erica SchoenbergerThe Professional Geographer, 1992
- On Critical Realism, Human Geography, and Arcane Sects!The Professional Geographer, 1991
- On Realism, in Geography and ElsewhereThe Professional Geographer, 1991
- THE CORPORATE INTERVIEW AS A RESEARCH METHOD IN ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY∗The Professional Geographer, 1991
- REALISM AND THE PRACTICE OF GEOGRAPHYThe Professional Geographer, 1990
- LEVELS OF ABSTRACTION IN LOCALITY STUDIES*Antipode, 1989