The Case Against Statistical Significance Testing, Revisited
- 1 July 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Experimental Education
- Vol. 61 (4) , 287-292
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1993.10806591
Abstract
At present, too many research results in education are blatantly described as significant, when they are in fact trivially small and unimportant. There are several things researchers can do to minimize the importance of statistical significance testing and get articles published without using these tests. First, they can insert statistically in front of significant in research reports. Second, results can be interpreted before p values are reported. Third, effect sizes can be reported along with measures of sampling error. Fourth, replication can be built into the design. The touting of insignificant results as significant because they are statistically significant is not likely to change until researchers break the stranglehold that statistical significance testing has on journal editors.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Confidence Intervals and the Scientific MethodThe Journal of Experimental Education, 1993
- Historical Origins of Statistical Testing PracticesThe Journal of Experimental Education, 1993
- The Case Against Statistical Significance Testing, RevisitedThe Journal of Experimental Education, 1993
- Publishing in the Journal of Educational Psychology: Reflections at midstream.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1993
- Editorial.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1992
- New developments in pairwise multiple comparisons: Some powerful and practicable procedures.Psychological Bulletin, 1991
- Editorial.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1991
- Another look at Meehl, Lakatos, and the scientific practices of psychologists.American Psychologist, 1987
- Some Methodological and Statistical “Bugs” in Research on Children’s LearningPublished by Springer Nature ,1985
- DETERMINING SAMPLE SIZE FOR PLANNED AND POST HOC ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE COMPARISONS1Journal of Educational Measurement, 1975