VARIATION JN PATIENT RESPONSE ASSOCIATED WITH DIFFERENT PREPARATIONS OF MURINE MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY THERAPY

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
The sera of 37 renal and 12 liver allograft recipients treated with OKT3 (42), Leu2a (7), or both (2) monoclonal antibodies were serially analyzed by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to determine the humoral response (IgG) to mAb. Anti-mAb IgG to the treatment mAb was detected in the serum of 23 (76%) renal and 6 (50%) liver OKT3 recipients, and all 7 Leu2a renal recipients, usually within 14 days of mAb completion, but never during the first week of Rx. Each of the 7 Leu2a recipients developed reactivity not only to Leu2a isotype (IgG1), but also to OKT3 isotype (IgG2a). In contrast, only 1 of the 42 renal and liver allograft recipients treated with OKT3 developed reactivity to the Leu2a isotype. Blocking studies indicated that the specificity of the response to the treatment mAb was directed at the idiotype-and, in some patients, to the constant domain (isotype) of the mAb administered. The antibody response to an alternate isotype (IgG2a) observed in Leu2a (IgG1)-treated patients most likely resulted from irrelevant immunoglobulin (IgG2a) in the Leu2a preparation. This reactivity appeared to be specific for the IgG2a subclass. Clinicians administering mAb therapy should be aware that various mAb preparations may contain immunoglobulin isotypes unrelated to the therapeutic mAb. Crossimmunization to the irrelevant immunoglobulins may occur, precluding subsequent use of other mAbs sharing similar isotype.