Ventricular fibrillation complicating acute myocardial infarction: Reasons against the routine use of lidocaine
- 1 September 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in American Heart Journal
- Vol. 104 (3) , 545-550
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-8703(82)90225-3
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinical characteristics, electrocardiographic and enzyme correlations, and long-term prognosis of patients with chest pain associated with ST depression and/or T wave inversionAmerican Heart Journal, 1980
- Should lidocaine be administered routinely to all patients after acute myocardial infarction?Circulation, 1978
- Restricted Lignocaine Prophylaxis in Acute Myocardial InfarctionActa Medica Scandinavica, 1977
- Clinical use and toxicity of intravenous lidocaineAmerican Heart Journal, 1976
- The Clinical Pharmacology of Lidocaine as an Antiarrhythymic DrugCirculation, 1974
- Comprehensive treatment plan for the prevention of primary ventricular fibrillation in acute myocardial infarctionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1974
- The long-term prognosis for patients resuscitated after cardiac arrest: A follow-up studyAmerican Heart Journal, 1969
- Ventricular fibrillation in acute myocardial infarction: Prognosis following successful resuscitationAmerican Heart Journal, 1969
- Survival after resuscitation from cardiac arrest in acute myocardial infarctionAmerican Heart Journal, 1965
- Effectiveness of an intensive coronary care areaThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1965