Cost-Effectiveness Comparison of Estrogen Therapy and Orchidectomy in Patients With Prostatic Cancer
- 1 October 1987
- journal article
- general essays
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
- Vol. 3 (4) , 523-529
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462300011156
Abstract
This study compares the cost of antitumor therapy and adverse cardiovascular effects during the first year of treatment with either exogenous estrogens or orchidectomy of patients with prostatic cancer. We found that the higher costs for the orchidectomy patients were partially outweighed by the costs of treating cardiovascular complications in the estrogen-treated patients; the net overcost of orchidectomy is balanced after two and a half years by the ongoing costs of estrogen treatment. The fact that 25% of the patients treated with estrogen suffered cardiovascular complications, but no difference in mortality rates between the two groups was observed, speaks in favor of orchidectomy as the preferred treatment for prostatic carcinoma.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hormonal Therapy for Prostate CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984
- Foundations of Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Health and Medical PracticesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1977
- Treatment of Prostatic Carcinoma with Various Types of Estrogen DerivativesPublished by Elsevier ,1976
- Estrogen treatment for cancer of the prostate.Early results with 3 doses of diethylstilbestrol and placeboCancer, 1970
- Carcinoma of the Prostate: Treatment ComparisonsJournal of Urology, 1967
- Studies on Prostatic Cancer. III. The Effects of Fever, of Desoxycorticosterone and of Estrogen on Clinical Patients with Metastatic Carcinoma of the Prostate ,Journal of Urology, 1941
- STUDIES ON PROSTATIC CANCERArchives of Surgery, 1941