Reverse flow in turbidity currents: the role of internal solitons

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Pickering & Hiscott, (1985) have demonstrated amply the presence of reverse‐flow units within the thick‐bedded calcareous wacke (TCW) beds of the turbiditic Cloridorme Formation (Middle Ordovician, Gaspé Peninsula, Quebec, Canada). These reverse‐flow units are underlain and overlain by units which reveal flow in the primary (obverse) direction.In this paper, a model is proposed for this reverse flow, based on the probable nature of the primary turbidity flow. It appears that the initial flow was highly elongated (thickness h≪ length L), with h∼ 500 m, velocity U∼ 2 m s‐1 and sediment concentration C∼ 1·25%o. The rate of momentum loss of the flow is estimated by means of a useful parameter which we call the ‘drag distance’, symbol dD, defined by image where h and L are the thickness and length of the flow, respectively; cCd is a combined drag coefficient representing friction on the bottom and at the upper interface; and fCd is a form‐drag coefficient related to the shape and size of the head. dD is the distance travelled by a current of constant h and L, flowing over a horizontal bottom and obeying a quadratic friction law, for an e‐fold reduction in velocity.Simple considerations, confirmed by our own experiments (described in this paper), show that such an elongated turbidity current cannot be reflected as a whole from an adverse slope: when the nose of the current reaches the slope, it forms a hump, which surges backwards and sooner or later breaks up into a series of internal solitons. The latter, probably numbering 4–7, will cause reverse flow at a given point as they pass by, provided that the residual velocity in the tail is not too great. Flow in the original (obverse) direction will be re‐established after the passage of the solitons. Quiescent periods in front of, between and behind the solitons, when soliton‐associated currents cancelled out the residual obverse flow, would allow the deposition of thin mud‐drapes.Additional flow reversals observed in a few of the TCW beds cannot be explained readily by the re‐passage of solitons, since wave breaking at the ends of the basin would cause massive energy loss; internal seiches are the preferred explanation for these later reversals.