Development and Internal Validation of a Nomogram Predicting the Probability of Prostate Cancer Gleason Sum Upgrading Between Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Pathology
- 23 December 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in European Urology
- Vol. 49 (5) , 820-826
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2005.11.007
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Predicting Nonsentinel Node Status After Positive Sentinel Lymph Biopsy for Breast Cancer: Clinicians Versus NomogramAnnals of Surgical Oncology, 2005
- Comparison of Accuracy Between the Partin Tables Of 1997 and 2001 to Predict Final Pathological Stage in Clinically Localized Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, 2004
- The Addition of Interleukin-6 Soluble Receptor and Transforming Growth Factor Beta1 Improves a Preoperative Nomogram for Predicting Biochemical Progression in Patients With Clinically Localized Prostate CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2003
- Gleason scores of prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens over the past 10 yearsCancer, 2002
- How Well Does The Partin Nomogram Predict Pathological Stage After Radical Prostatectomy In A Community Based Population? Results Of The Cancer Of The Prostate Strategic Urological Research EndeavorJournal of Urology, 2002
- VALIDATION OF PARTIN TABLES FOR PREDICTING PATHOLOGICAL STAGE OF CLINICALLY LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCERJournal of Urology, 2000
- Update on the Appropriate Staging Evaluation for Newly Diagnosed Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, 1997
- Re: Editorial CommentJournal of Urology, 1997
- A Multivariate Analysis of Clinical and Pathological Factors that Predict for Prostate Specific Antigen Failure after Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, 1995
- Correlation with Grade in 316 Matched ProstatectomiesThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 1994