Genetic Admixture among Hispanics and Candidate Gene Polymorphisms: Potential for Confounding in a Breast Cancer Study?
Open Access
- 1 January 2007
- journal article
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
- Vol. 16 (1) , 142-150
- https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-06-0706
Abstract
Hispanics in the U.S. Southwest have genetic ancestry from Europeans and from American Indians, two groups with markedly different breast cancer incidence rates. Genetic admixture may therefore bias estimates of associations between candidate cancer susceptibility genes and breast cancer in Hispanics. We estimated genetic admixture using 15 ancestry-informative markers for 1,239 Hispanics and 2,505 non-Hispanic Whites in a breast cancer case-control study in the Southwest, the Four Corners Study. Confounding risk ratios (CRR) were calculated to quantify potential bias due to admixture. Genetic admixture was strongly related to self-reported race and ethnic background (P < 0.0001). Among Hispanic controls, admixture was significantly associated with allele frequency for 5 of 11 candidate gene single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) examined. Hispanics in the highest versus the lowest quintile of American Indian admixture had higher mean body mass index at age 30 years (25.4 versus 23.6 kg/m2; P = 0.003), shorter mean height (1.56 versus 1.58 m; P = 0.01), higher prevalence of diabetes (14.8% versus 7.2%; P = 0.04), and a larger proportion with less than a high school education (38.5% versus 23.2%; P = 0.001). Admixture was not associated with breast cancer risk among Hispanics (P = 0.65). CRRs for potential bias to candidate SNP-breast cancer risk ratios ranged from 0.99 to 1.01. Thus, although genetic admixture in Hispanics was associated with exposures, confounding by admixture was negligible due to the null association between admixture and breast cancer. CRRs from simulated scenarios indicated that appreciable confounding by admixture would occur only when within-group candidate SNP allele frequency differences are much larger than any that we observed. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16(1):142–50)Keywords
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Body size, weight change, fat distribution and breast cancer risk in Hispanic and non-Hispanic white womenBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2006
- Associations between ERα, ERβ, and AR Genotypes and Colon and Rectal CancerCancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 2005
- Population stratification confounds genetic association studies among LatinosHuman Genetics, 2005
- Comparison of three methods to estimate genetic ancestry and control for stratification in genetic association studies among admixed populationsHuman Genetics, 2005
- Bias Correction with a Single Null Marker for Population Stratification in Candidate Gene Association StudiesHuman Heredity, 2005
- Relation of type 2 diabetes to individual admixture and candidate gene polymorphisms in the Hispanic American population of San Luis Valley, ColoradoJournal of Medical Genetics, 2004
- Informativeness of Genetic Markers for Inference of Ancestry*American Journal of Human Genetics, 2003
- Mexican American ancestry-informative markers: examination of population structure and marker characteristics in European Americans, Mexican Americans, Amerindians and AsiansHuman Genetics, 2003
- Novel Promoter Polymorphism in Insulin-Like Growth Factor-Binding Protein-3: Correlation with Serum Levels and Interaction with Known RegulatorsJournal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2001
- Aminoacid polymorphisms of insulin receptor substrate-1 in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitusThe Lancet, 1993