Process Dissociation Procedure: Double Dissociations following Divided Attention and Speeded Responding
Open Access
- 1 May 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A
- Vol. 50 (2) , 318-336
- https://doi.org/10.1080/027249897392116
Abstract
The validity of the process dissociation procedure was examined by manipulating attention and speed of responding in a recognition task. Both manipulations were expected to decrease the probability of controlled memory processes, c, while leaving the probability of automatic memory processes, a, unaffected. In order to estimate c and a, a multinomial processing tree model was fitted to the data. Contrary to expectation, a double dissociation (i.e.a decrease inc coupled with an increase in a) was obtained, suggesting that a does not accurately measure the probability of automatic processes. The results are discussed with reference to the independence assumption in the process dissociation procedure.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- A response to graf and komatsu's critique of the process dissociation procedure: When is caution necessary?The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 1995
- Process dissociation procedure: Core assumptions fail, sometimesThe European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 1995
- Instance-based categorization: Automatic versus intentional forms of retrievalMemory & Cognition, 1995
- Violations of the independence assumption in process dissociation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1995
- Dissociations of processes in recognition memory: Effects of interference and of response speed.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 1994
- Process dissociation procedure: Handle with caution!The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 1994
- The problem of differing false-alarm rates for the process dissociation procedure: Comment on Verfaellie and Treadwell (1993).Neuropsychology, 1994
- Toward a redefinition of implicit memory: Process dissociations following elaborative processing and self-generation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1994
- Bizarreness effects in verbal tasks and subject-performed tasksThe European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 1993
- Multinomial modeling and the measurement of cognitive processes.Psychological Review, 1988