Comparison between eosinophilic markers in induced sputum and blood in asthmatic patients
- 1 October 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Clinical and Experimental Allergy
- Vol. 28 (10) , 1237-1243
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2222.1998.00341.x
Abstract
Background: The usefulness and safety of the analysis of blood inflammatory markers in asthma are widely recognized. Recently, the analysis of induced sputum has been proposed as a safe, non‐invasive tool in the study of airway inflammation in asthma.Objective: Our aim was to test whether sputum analysis is more useful than blood analysis in the evaluation of airway inflammation in untreated and treated asthmatic patients.Methods: Twelve untreated patients with mild to moderate asthma underwent a methacholine challenge test, sputum induction and blood sampling. A group of 14 normal subjects was also evaluated for baseline comparison. The same evaluation was repeated after 3 months of budesonide treatment. Before and after treatment, we tested the relationship of eosinophilic markers in induced sputum and blood with clinical and functional data. We also compared eosinophilic markers in induced sputum with the same markers in blood.Results: Untreated patients showed a significant relationship between sputum eosinophils and symptom score, and between sputum eosinophilic cationic protein and symptom score, FEV1 and PD20FEV1. No relationship between blood eosinophilic markers and clinical or functional data was observed. In budesonide‐treated patients, both sputum and blood eosinophils were significantly lower than in untreated patients, but eosinophil decrease was greater in sputum than in blood. Sputum eosinophilic proteins were also significantly lower in treated patients, whereas serum eosinophilic proteins were low at baseline and remained unchanged after treatment. Sputum eosinophilic markers were lower in normal subjects than in both untreated and treated patients, while blood eosinophils, but not serum eosinophilic cationic protein, were lower in normals than in untreated patients.Conclusions: The analysis of induced sputum is more useful than the analysis of blood in the evaluation of asthma severity and of the effect of glucocorticoid treatment in patients with mild to moderate asthma.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measuring airway inflammation in asthma: Eosinophils and eosinophilic cationic protein in induced sputum compared with peripheral bloodJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 1997
- Comparison between hypertonic and isotonic saline‐induced sputum in the evaluation of airway inflammation in subjects with moderate asthmaClinical and Experimental Allergy, 1996
- Comparison of inhaled salmeterol and individually dose-titrated slow-release theophylline in patients with reversible airway obstruction. European Study GroupEuropean Respiratory Journal, 1996
- Evaluation of serum eosinophilic cationic protein as a marker of disease activity in chronic asthmaJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 1995
- Analysis of induced sputum to examine the effects of prednisone on airway inflammation in asthmatic subjectsJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 1994
- Analysis of cellular and biochemical constituents of induced sputum after allergen challenge: A method for studying allergic airway inflammationJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 1994
- Total blood eosinophils, serum eosinophil cationic protein and eosinophil protein X in childhood asthma: relation to disease status and therapyClinical and Experimental Allergy, 1993
- Use of induced sputum cell counts to investigate airway inflammation in asthma.Thorax, 1992
- Comparison of a β2-Agonist, Terbutaline, with an Inhaled Corticosteroid, Budesonide, in Newly Detected AsthmaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Cellular characteristics of sputum from patients with asthma and chronic bronchitis.Thorax, 1989