Correlation of serological, quantitative and cell‐mediated functional assays of maternal alloantibodies with the severity of haemolytic disease of the newborn

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Serum samples containing IgG red blood cell (RBC) antibodies were collected without reference to clinical information from 131 pregnant alloimmunized women. Anti-D and anti-K were present in sera from 75 and 20 patients respectively. Antibody titres were determined by indirect antiglobulin test (IAGT), anti-D levels were measured by AutoAnalyzer, RBC-binding IgG was quantified using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (SOL-ELISA), and functional activities were measured using the monocyte chemiluminescence (CL) test, antibody-dependent monocytemediated and K cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) assays, and rosette formation with U937 cells. Details of clinical outcomes were obtained retrospectively from 104 pregnancies. Forty-one babies were ‘antigen-negative’, and of the remainder, four required top-up transfusions, 12 required exchange transfusions, three received intrauterine transfusions, and two died in utero. A comparison of test results with severity of haemolytic disease of the newborn (HDN) showed that, provided sera tested were collected within 8 weeks of the expected delivery date, the CL test and the monocyte-mediated ADCC assay differentiated those D-positive babies which required exchange transfusions from those unaffected or only mildly affected. The usefulness of results from the AutoAnalyzer and IAGT in predicting disease severity was compromised by the wide range of results from mothers of unaffected babies. This variability was less apparent in the SOL-ELISA which predicted severe HDN with greater precision. Results from the U937 rosette assay and the K cell-mediated ADCC assay failed to correlate with disease severity.