Relationship between various maternal body mass measures and size of the newborn
Open Access
- 1 October 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
- Vol. 36 (4) , 664-668
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/36.4.664
Abstract
As shown in 44,725 consecutive pregnancies (21,861 white women and 22,864 Black women), body-mass indices that include stature are no more effective than prepregnancy weight in “predicting” the size of the newborn. As calculated for weight-for-height and height-for-weight indices, using both correlations and comparison of decile groupings, birth weight and birth weight variability (σ) are better related to maternal prepregnancy weight than the body mass indices using roots or powers of weight and height.This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Relative merits of old and new indices of body mass with reference to skinfold thicknessThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1982
- Grading body fatness from limited anthropometric dataThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1981
- Relative merits of the weight-corrected-for-height indicesThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1981
- Effect of maternal smoking on weight and weight gain between pregnanciesThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1978
- Newborn body composition and its relationship to linear growthThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1977