On the Performance of Hedge Funds
- 1 July 1999
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in CFA Magazine
- Vol. 55 (4) , 72-85
- https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v55.n4.2287
Abstract
Empirical evidence indicates that hedge funds differ substantially from traditional investment vehicles, such as mutual funds. Unlike mutual funds, hedge funds follow dynamic trading strategies and have low systematic risk. Hedge funds' special fee structures apparently align managers' incentives with fund performance. Funds with “high watermarks” (under which managers are required to make up previous losses before receiving any incentive fees) significantly outperform those without. Hedge funds provide higher Sharpe ratios than mutual funds, and their performance in the period of January 1992 through December 1996 reflects better manager skills, although hedge fund returns are more volatile. Average hedge fund returns are related positively to incentive fees, fund assets, and the lockup period.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Performance of Hedge Funds: Risk, Return, and IncentivesThe Journal of Finance, 1999
- Are Some Mutual Fund Managers Better Than Others? Cross‐Sectional Patterns in Behavior and PerformanceThe Journal of Finance, 1999
- Offshore Hedge Funds: Survival and Performance, 1989–95The Journal of Business, 1999
- Survivorship Bias and Investment Style in the Returns of CTAsThe Journal of Portfolio Management, 1997
- Empirical Characteristics of Dynamic Trading Strategies: The Case of Hedge FundsThe Review of Financial Studies, 1997
- The Persistence of Risk-Adjusted Mutual Fund PerformanceThe Journal of Business, 1996
- Contrarian Investment, Extrapolation, and RiskThe Journal of Finance, 1994
- Contrarian Investment, Extrapolation, and RiskThe Journal of Finance, 1994
- Survivorship Bias in Performance StudiesThe Review of Financial Studies, 1992
- Mutual Fund Performance: An Analysis of Quarterly Portfolio HoldingsThe Journal of Business, 1989