Evaluation of the MOS SF-36 physical functioning scale (PF-40): II. Comparison of relative precision using Likert and Rasch scoring methods
- 1 April 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 50 (4) , 451-461
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(96)00424-6
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Interpretation of change scores in ordinal clinical scales and health status measures: The whole may not equal the sum of the partsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1996
- Evaluation of the mos SF-36 physical functioning scale (PF-10): I. Unidimensionality and reproducibility of the Rasch Item scaleJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1994
- The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of Data Quality, Scaling Assumptions, and Reliability Across Diverse Patient GroupsMedical Care, 1994
- Measurement-Related Problems in Functional AssessmentAmerican Journal of Occupational Therapy, 1993
- A comparative contrast of clinimetric and psychometric methods for constructing indexes and rating scalesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1992
- The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Medical Care, 1992
- The Duke Health ProfileMedical Care, 1990
- The MOS Short-form General Health SurveyMedical Care, 1988
- The functional status questionnaireJournal of General Internal Medicine, 1986
- The Duke-UNC Health Profile: An Adult Health Status Instrument for Primary CareMedical Care, 1981