The BAHA HC200/300 in comparison with conventional bone conduction hearing aids.
- 1 June 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Clinical Otolaryngology
- Vol. 24 (3) , 171-176
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2273.1999.00193.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Intraindividual Comparison of the Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid and Air-Conduction Hearing AidsJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 1998
- Patients' Opinions of Bone-Anchored vs Conventional Hearing AidsJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 1995
- Perceived sound quality of three bone-anchored hearing aid modelsBritish Journal of Audiology, 1995
- Audiologic Results for the Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid HC220Ear & Hearing, 1994
- Hearing with the bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA, HC 200) compared to a conventional bone-conduction hearing aidClinical Otolaryngology, 1992
- The Bone-anchored Hearing Aid:Osseointegration and Audiological EflectActa Oto-Laryngologica, 1992
- Skull Simulator for Direct Bone Conduction Hearing DevicesScandinavian Audiology, 1989
- Hearing Thresholds with Direct Bone Conduction Versus Conventional Bone ConductionScandinavian Audiology, 1984
- Improving the Reliability of Testing the Speech Reception Threshold for SentencesInternational Journal of Audiology, 1979