Comparison of Primary Angioplasty and Conservative Treatment on Short- and Long-term Outcome in Octogenarian or Older Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.
- 1 January 2002
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by International Heart Journal (Japanese Heart Journal) in Japanese Heart Journal
- Vol. 43 (5) , 463-474
- https://doi.org/10.1536/jhj.43.463
Abstract
It has long been established that advanced age is not only associated with greater myocardial infarction frequency but also greater mortality and morbidity. The treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in 80 year old patients remains problematic with conflicting results; in these patients, the risks of conservative treatment are high and the risks and benefits of thrombolytic therapy are still controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether primary angioplasty can offer an important alternative method to improve short- and long-term outcomes in octogenarian or older patients who experience AMI. Between May 1986 and March 2000, 171 consecutive 80 year old patients hospitalized for AMI were not randomized to be registered and divided into a medical therapy group (group 1: an historical control group, n=11) and a primary angioplasty group (group 2, n=60). In-hospital mortality was markedly increased with advanced Killip scores (Killip 3 or 4) in both groups. Twenty-four hours after admission, group 1 patients had a significantly higher incidence of progression to higher Killip scores than did group 2 patients (P=0.006). The 30-day overall mortality of group 2 patients was significantly lower than in group 1 patients (30.0% vs 54.1%, P=0.003). Patients without cardiogenic shock treated by primary angioplasty had a significantly lower incidence of overall mortality at 30 days than patients without cardiogenic shock treated conservatively [3.1% vs 24.3%, P=0.016 (Killip 1 and 2); 18.2% vs 52.6%, P=0.044 (Killip 3)]. However, the mortality rate of cardiogenic shock was extremely high and did not differ significantly between groups I and 2 (86.1% vs 88.2%, P=0.99). The 3-year cumulative survival rate was significantly higher in group 2 than in group 1 patients (P=0.0009). In conclusion, primary angioplasty is feasible and effective, and can improve short-and long-term mortalities in octogenarian or older patients with AMI but without cardiogenic shock.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Systematic primary angioplasty in octogenarian and older patientsAmerican Heart Journal, 1999
- Age-related mortality, clinical heart failure, and ventricular fibrillation in 4259 Danish patients after acute myocardial infarctionEuropean Heart Journal, 1997
- A Clinical Trial Comparing Primary Coronary Angioplasty with Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Use of Cardiac Procedures and Outcomes in Elderly Patients with Myocardial Infarction in the United States and CanadaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Results of direct percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in octogenariansThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1996
- Population-wide mortality trends among patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction: The Ontario experience, 1981 to 1991Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1994
- A Comparison of Immediate Angioplasty with Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- The impact of age on the incidence and prognosis of initial acute myocardial infarction: The Worcester Heart Attack StudyAmerican Heart Journal, 1989
- Cardiovascular care of the elderly: Economic considerationsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1987
- In-hospital mortality rates from acute myocardial infarction by race in U.S. hospitals: findings from the National Hospital Discharge Survey.Circulation, 1987