Benefit and Harm Associated with Screening for Breast Cancer
- 16 April 1998
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 338 (16) , 1145-1146
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199804163381609
Abstract
Despite many high-quality randomized trials, the balance of harm and benefit attributable to breast-cancer screening is not known for women 40 to 49 years of age. In this issue of the Journal, Elmore et al.1 describe a high rate of false positive results of such screening. Over a period of 10 years, nearly one third of the women screened had at least one false positive mammogram or clinical breast examination. Physicians must integrate this information into their approach to helping women decide about breast-cancer screening.Periodic screening invites repeated exposure to the possibility of a false positive result, as occurs . . .Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ten-Year Risk of False Positive Screening Mammograms and Clinical Breast ExaminationsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: Breast Cancer Screening for Women Ages 40-49, January 21-23, 1997. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development PanelJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1997
- Contentious Screening Decisions — Does the Choice Matter?New England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Efficacy of screening mammography. A meta-analysisJAMA, 1995
- American cancer society guidelines from the past to the presentCancer, 1993
- Breast cancer screening with mammography: overview of Swedish randomised trialsThe Lancet, 1993
- Psychological and Behavioral Implications of Abnormal MammogramsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1991
- Book ReviewClinical Decision AnalysisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1981