Taming the Giant Corporation? Some Cautionary Remarks on the Deterrability of Corporate Crime
- 1 July 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Crime & Delinquency
- Vol. 33 (3) , 379-402
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128787033003004
Abstract
Conventional wisdom accords deterrence a prominent role in the control of corporate crime. It is argued that current confidence in a deterrence strategy is unfounded, first, because it is based on an unrealistic view of corporate decision making and, second, because it makes an overly optimistic appraisal of our legal system's capacity to control corporate conduct through punitive means. It is further argued that efforts to increase the sanctions imposed on corporate offenders may produce unintended consequences that would increase, rather than lessen, the victimization resulting from corporate wrongdoing. “Penetrating” legal controls, such as incapacitation and rehabilitation, are proposed as preferable alternatives.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Export of Hazardous Factories to Developing NationsPublished by Taylor & Francis ,2019
- Delinquency and OpportunityPublished by Taylor & Francis ,2013
- DENYING THE GUILTY MIND: ACCOUNTING FOR INVOLVEMENT IN A WHITE‐COLLAR CRIME*Criminology, 1985
- White Collar CrimeAnnual Review of Sociology, 1985
- Law and Power: The Sherman Antitrust Act and Its Enforcement in the Petroleum IndustrySocial Problems, 1985
- Public support for punishing white-collar crime: Blaming the victim revisited?Journal of Criminal Justice, 1983
- On Theory and Action for Corporate Crime ControlCrime & Delinquency, 1982
- Recent Econometric Modeling of Crime and PunishmentEvaluation Review, 1980
- Developments in the Law: Corporate Crime: Regulating Corporate Behavior Through Criminal SanctionsHarvard Law Review, 1979
- The Allocation of Effort under Uncertainty: The Case of Risk-Averse BehaviorJournal of Political Economy, 1973