Improving the homogeneity of diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) by using clinical laboratory, demographic, and discharge data.
- 1 April 1989
- journal article
- Published by American Public Health Association in American Journal of Public Health
- Vol. 79 (4) , 441-444
- https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.79.4.441
Abstract
For 48 of the most common diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) at our hospital, we examined the ability of clinical laboratory tests, demographic data, and ICD-9-CM codes, which provide a measure of severity of illness, to predict patients' length of stay (LOS) more accurately than DRGs alone. For 10 of 20 medical DRGs and 13 of 23 surgical DRGs examined, we were able to increase the ability to predict LOS by at least 10 per cent. The laboratory tests that proved most predictive of LOS over all DRGs were the mean serum sodium, potassium, bicarbonate, and albumin. The system is data driven, objective, and flexible, thus ensuring its utility for the purpose of equitable reimbursement.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- The computerized severity index. A new sophisticated tool to measure hospital quality of care.1987
- Severity of Illness Within DRGsMedical Care, 1986
- Will Payment Based on Diagnosis-Related Groups Control Hospital Costs?New England Journal of Medicine, 1984
- The Sensitivity and Specificity of Nutrition-Related Variables in Relationship to the Duration of Hospital Stay and the Rate of ComplicationsMayo Clinic Proceedings, 1984
- Measuring Severity of Illness: Comparisons Across InstitutionsAmerican Journal of Public Health, 1983
- Measuring Severity of Illness: Homogeneous Case Mix GroupsMedical Care, 1983
- Review Article : Hospital Case Mix: Its Definition, Measurement and Use: Part II. Review of Alternative MeasuresMedical Care Review, 1982
- Nutritional AssessmentNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982