Neuro-Oncology Working Group 01 Trial of Nimustine Plus Teniposide Versus Nimustine Plus Cytarabine Chemotherapy in Addition to Involved-Field Radiotherapy in the First-Line Treatment of Malignant Glioma
- 1 September 2003
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 21 (17) , 3276-3284
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2003.03.509
Abstract
Purpose: The role of chemotherapy in the primary treatment of malignant glioma remains controversial. The results from the German-Austrian Glioma trial (GAG, 1983 to 1988) demonstrated a survival benefit for chemotherapy using carmustine (BCNU) plus teniposide (VM26) over BCNU alone in addition to radiotherapy in patients with a Karnofsky performance score (KPS) more than 60. The Neuro-Oncology Working Group (NOA) of the German Cancer Society therefore compared the efficacy of nimustine (ACNU) plus VM26 and ACNU plus cytarabine (Ara-C) chemotherapy in addition to standard radiotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed malignant glioma. Patients and Methods: From 1994 to 2000, 375 patients were randomly assigned to receive radiotherapy and cycles of ACNU 90 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) on day 1 and VM26 60 mg/m2 IV on days 1 to 3 (n = 183), or ACNU 90 mg/m2 IV on day 1 and Ara-C 120 mg/m2 IV on days 1 to 3 (n = 179), in 6-week intervals. Thirteen patients were not eligible after central neuropathology review. The remaining 362 patients had glioblastoma (n = 301) or anaplastic glioma (n = 61). Results: Median survival and 2-year survival rates were 17.3 months and 25% for ACNU plus VM26, and 15.7 months and 29% for ACNU plus Ara-C in glioblastoma, and 60 months and 88% for ACNU plus VM26 and 62.5 months and 72% for ACNU plus Ara-C in anaplastic glioma. Multivariate analysis revealed no survival advantage for either arm or for subpopulations defined by histology, age, or KPS. Hematologic toxicity was more prominent in the ACNU plus Ara-C arm. Conclusion: The median survival times and 2-year survival rates for patients with anaplastic glioma and glioblastoma achieved in the NOA-01 trial compare favorably with historical trials and with the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group database. The toxicity profile favors ACNU plus VM26 for further evaluation.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Chemotherapy in adult high-grade glioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 12 randomised trialsThe Lancet, 2002
- Randomized Trial of Procarbazine, Lomustine, and Vincristine in the Adjuvant Treatment of High-Grade Astrocytoma: A Medical Research Council TrialJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2001
- Multicenter Phase II Trial of Temozolomide in Patients With Anaplastic Astrocytoma or Anaplastic Oligoastrocytoma at First RelapseJournal of Clinical Oncology, 1999
- Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Recurrent Glioma Patients Enrolled Onto Phase II Clinical TrialsJournal of Clinical Oncology, 1999
- Malignant glioma: Who benefits from adjuvant chemotherapy?Annals of Neurology, 1998
- Validation and Predictive Power of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) Recursive Partitioning Analysis Classes for Malignant Glioma Patients: A Report Using RTOG 90-06☆International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1998
- Recursive Partitioning Analysis of Prognostic Factors in Three Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Malignant Glioma TrialsJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1993
- Meta-analysis of radiation therapy with and without adjuvant chemotherapy for malignant gliomas in adultsCancer, 1993
- Randomized Comparisons of Radiotherapy and Nitrosoureas for the Treatment of Malignant Glioma after SurgeryNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980
- Planning the size and duration of a clinical trial studying the time to some critical eventJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1974