DIRECTION-OF-MOTION STEREOTYPES: A REVIEW
- 1 April 1962
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Ergonomics
- Vol. 5 (2) , 357-383
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00140136208930601
Abstract
The offets of directional relationships between controls and displays are examined, with special reference to the influence of experience and of conditions of stress. Methods of investigation are discussed. The literature is reviewed to determine what stereotypes appear to be reasonably well-established, and attention is drawn to a number of deficiencies in current knowledge. Consideration is given to the effects of the operator's orientation, the hand ho employs for response, the initial position of the display, and the direction of scale numbering.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Direction-of-knobturn stereotypes.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1959
- Relation of stress and differential position habits to performance in motor learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1959
- Performance as a function of control-display relations, positions of the operator, and locations of the control.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1958
- Perception and communication.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1958
- DISPLAY‐CONTROL RELATIONSHIPS ON CIRCULAR AND LINEAR SCALESBritish Journal of Psychology, 1956
- Performance on several control-display arrangements as a function of age.Canadian Journal of Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie, 1955
- Constant velocity tracking as a function of S's handedness and the rate and direction of the target course.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1955
- Transfer Effects in Following Tracking (Modified Sam Two-Hand Coordination Test) as a Function of Reversal of the Display-Control Relationships on Alternate Blocks of TrialsThe Journal of Psychology, 1954
- S-R compatibility: spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1953
- Some relations between stimulus patterns and performance in a continuous dual pursuit task.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1952