THE VANISHING IMPORTANCE OF AGE IN RENAL TRANSPLANTATION
- 1 February 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Transplantation
- Vol. 67 (4) , 576-580
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00007890-199902270-00015
Abstract
The growing number of patients awaiting a kidney transplant raises questions about allocation of kidneys to the elderly and about the use of elderly donors. In all reported studies analyzing the influence of age on the outcome after renal transplantation, age is investigated as a categorical variable. We studied age both as a categorical (Kaplan-Meier) and as a continuous (Cox) variable in a total of 509 cyclosporine-treated recipients of a primary cadaveric kidney graft who underwent transplantation between July 1983 and July 1997. For the Kaplan-Meier analysis, the population was divided into three comparably sized age groups: 17-43 years (n=171), 44-55 years (n=169), and 56-75 years (n=169). Patient survival was better and graft survival censored for death was worse in the younger patients. Overall graft survival (end point was death or graft failure) was not significantly influenced by age. In the Cox proportional hazards analysis, transplantation year turned out to be an important, independent variable influencing all end points. Because the influence was not linear, three periods were defined in which the relative risk remained stable: 1983-1990 1991-1993, and 1994-1997. In the second period, the relative risk for transplant failure or death was 49% of that in the first period. In the third period, the relative risk had decreased to 22% of that in the first period. Recipient age and donor age were significant predictors of overall transplant failure. There was no interaction between these variables and transplantation year. Within each transplantation period, an increase in recipient age by 1 year increased the relative risk for overall graft failure by only 1.44%. The influence of donor age followed a J-shaped curve with a minimum at 30 years. The influence of increasing either recipient or donor age was counteracted by the improving results over time. Considering the improving results over time, there are, at this moment, no arguments for an age restriction for kidney transplant recipients or donors.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Transplantation Report 1: renal transplantation in recipients aged 60 years or older at time of graftingNephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 1996
- Renal transplantation in older peopleThe Lancet, 1994
- γ-Interferon, Interleukin-4 and Interleukin-6 In Vitro Production in Old SubjectsAutoimmunity, 1993
- Cadaveric Renal Transplantation in Elderly Recipients: Is It Worthwhile?Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 1991
- Interleukin 2, interleukin 2 receptor, and interferon-γ synthesis and mRNA expression in phorbol myristate acetate and calcium lonophore A23187-stimulated T cells from elderly humansClinical Immunology and Immunopathology, 1989
- Current Experience With Renal Transplantation in Older PatientsAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases, 1988
- Renal transplantation in patients over 55 years oldBritish Journal of Surgery, 1988
- Renal Transplantation in the Older RecipientJournal of Urology, 1985
- Successful treatment of middle aged and elderly patients with end stage renal disease.BMJ, 1983
- Immunological studies of aging. Decreased production of and response to T cell growth factor by lymphocytes from aged humans.Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1981