MOLECULES VS MORPHOLOGY IN PHYLOGENETICS: A NON-CONTROVERSY
- 1 January 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa
- Vol. 46 (4) , 317-334
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00359198809520135
Abstract
The so-called molecules vs morphology ‘controversy’ currently plaguing phylogenetic systematics is discussed within a historical and philosophical context. It is concluded that the controversy is an artifact of flawed philosophy, improper project design and incorrect methods of data analysis, and that the controversy is sustained primarily by conflict of personalities. Moreover, the controversy may be resolved simply by closer collaboration between morphologists and molecular biologists, and by the use of philosophically sound phylogenetic methods (i.e. cladistics), founded on consilience and parsimony, and by the standardized use of mathematically correct analytical procedures.Keywords
This publication has 54 references indexed in Scilit:
- Multidimensional Analysis of an Evolving LineageScience, 1987
- Molecular Perspective on Higher-Level Relationships in the Tyrannoidea (Aves)Systematic Zoology, 1985
- Molecular drive: a cohesive mode of species evolutionNature, 1982
- Sequences of Sixteen Phosphoserine Peptides from Ovalbumins of Eight SpeciesEuropean Journal of Biochemistry, 1981
- Falsifiability, Consilience, and SystematicsSystematic Zoology, 1979
- Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1979
- Congruency of phylogenies derived from different proteinsJournal of Molecular Evolution, 1976
- Amino acid sequence and immunological properties of chachalaca egg white lysozymeJournal of Molecular Evolution, 1976
- Philosophical Foundations of Classical Evolutionary ClassificationSystematic Zoology, 1973
- THE ELECTROPHORETIC PATTERNS OF AVIAN EGG‐WHITE PROTEINS AS TAXONOMIC CHARACTERS*Ibis, 1960