Coexistence of competitors in metacommunities due to spatial variation in resource growth rates; does R * predict the outcome of competition?
- 12 August 2004
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Ecology Letters
- Vol. 7 (10) , 929-940
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00644.x
Abstract
Simple mathematical models are used to investigate the coexistence of two consumers using a single limiting resource that is distributed over distinct patches, and that has unequal growth rates in the different patches. Relatively low movement rates or high demographic rates of an inefficient resource exploiter allow it to coexist at a stable equilibrium with a more efficient species whose ratio of movement to demographic rates is lower. The range of conditions allowing coexistence depends on the between‐patch heterogeneity in resource growth rates, but this range can be quite broad. The between‐patch movement of the more efficient consumer turns patches with high resource growth rates into sources, while low‐growth‐rate patches effectively become sinks. A less efficient species can coexist with or even exclude the more efficient species from the global environment if it is better able to bias its spatial distribution towards the source patches. This can be accomplished with density independent dispersal if the less efficient species has a lower ratio of per capita between‐patch movement rate to demographic rates. Conditions that maximize the range of efficiencies allowing coexistence of two species are: a relatively high level of heterogeneity in resource growth conditions; high dispersal (or low demographic rates) of the superior competitor; and low dispersal (or high demographic rates) of the inferior competitor. Global exclusion of the more efficient competitor requires that the inferior competitor have sufficient movement to also produce a source‐sink environment.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Local dispersal can facilitate coexistence in the presence of permanent spatial heterogeneityEcology Letters, 2003
- Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species DiversityAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 2000
- General Theory of Competitive Coexistence in Spatially-Varying EnvironmentsTheoretical Population Biology, 2000
- Sources, Sinks and Pseudo-SinksJournal of Animal Ecology, 1995
- Complex Interactions in Metacommunities, with Implications for Biodiversity and Higher Levels of SelectionEcology, 1992
- Diffusion-mediated persistence in two-species competition Lotka-Volterra modelMathematical Biosciences, 1989
- INFLUENCE OF CELL SHAPE AND SIZE ON ALGAL COMPETITIVE ABILITY1Journal of Phycology, 1989
- Competition for inorganic substrates among chemoorganotrophic and chemolithotrophic bacteriaMicrobial Ecology, 1977
- Fugitive Species: Experiments with Fungi and Some Theoretical ConsiderationsEcology, 1976
- Partitioning of Resources and the Outcome of Interspecific Competition: A Model and Some General ConsiderationsThe American Naturalist, 1973