William James and the Pathologizing of Human Experience
- 1 April 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Humanistic Psychology
- Vol. 40 (2) , 176-226
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167800402006
Abstract
A sizable group of modern writers have been criticizing the prevalent practice of using pathology terms to describe human experiences. The practice of pathologizing was already prevalent more than 100 years ago when William James was a medical student at Harvard. Quotes from James’s letters, publications, and lectures inform us as to how his conceptualization of experiences commonly referred to as pathological developed as he matured. By the time James wrote The Varieties of Religious Experience, his dissatisfaction with pathology terminology reached its apex. Referring to it as “simple minded” and “superficial medical talk,” James employed three principles that provide an alternative to this kind of language and three principles that neutralize the negative effects that can occur whenever pathology terms are employed by others. These six principles are examined and then applied to James’s description of Leo Tolstoy’s profound struggle with melancholy.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Nature–nurture integration: The example of antisocial behavior.American Psychologist, 1997
- Does the biology go around the symptoms? A copernican shift in schizophrenia paradigmsClinical Psychology Review, 1996
- Models of scientific progress and the role of theory in taxonomy development: A case study of the DSM..Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1996
- Introduction to the special section on the development of theoretically coherent alternatives to the DSM system.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1996
- Mental disorder as a Roschian concept: A critique of Wakefield's "harmful dysfunction" analysis.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1995
- The Riddle of Consciousness and the Changing Scientific WorldViewJournal of Humanistic Psychology, 1995
- Thomas Szasz, William James, and the Psychiatric Drugs ControversyJournal of Humanistic Psychology, 1995
- Limits of operationalization: A critique of Spitzer and Endicott's (1978) proposed operational criteria for mental disorder.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1993
- The concept of mental disorder: On the boundary between biological facts and social values.American Psychologist, 1992
- The myth of mental illness.American Psychologist, 1960