Do madit results apply only to “MADIT patients”?
- 1 March 1997
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 79 (6) , 27-30
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(97)00118-5
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Update on MADIT: The multkenter automatic defibrillator implantation trialThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1997
- Unsustained Ventricular Tachycardia — To Treat or Not to TreatNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Improved Survival with an Implanted Defibrillator in Patients with Coronary Disease at High Risk for Ventricular ArrhythmiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Management of Nonsustained Ventricular Tachycardia Guided By Electrophysiological TestingPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1993
- Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial (MADIT): Design and Clinical ProtocolPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1991
- Electrophysiological testing and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia. Use and limitations in patients with coronary artery disease and impaired ventricular function.Circulation, 1990
- Long-term outcome with the automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillatorJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1989
- Prognostic factors in nonsustained ventricular tachycardiaThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1984
- Termination of Malignant Ventricular Arrhythmias with an Implanted Automatic Defibrillator in Human BeingsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980
- Clinical significance of ventricular tachycardia (3 beats or longer) detected during ambulatory monitoring after myocardial infarction.Circulation, 1978