Genetic variation and asexual reproduction in the facultatively parthenogenetic cockroach Nauphoeta cinerea: implications for the evolution of sex
- 1 January 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Evolutionary Biology
- Vol. 14 (1) , 68-74
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.2001.00254.x
Abstract
Asexual reproduction could offer up to a two-fold fitness advantage over sexual reproduction, yet higher organisms usually reproduce sexually. Even in facultatively parthenogenetic species, where both sexual and asexual reproduction is sometimes possible, asexual reproduction is rare. Thus, the debate over the evolution of sex has focused on ecological and mutation-elimination advantages of sex. An alternative explanation for the predominance of sex is that it is difficult for an organism to accomplish asexual reproduction once sexual reproduction has evolved. Difficulty in returning to asexuality could reflect developmental or genetic constraints. Here, we investigate the role of genetic factors in limiting asexual reproduction in Nauphoeta cinerea, an African cockroach with facultative parthenogenesis that nearly always reproduces sexually. We show that when N. cinerea females do reproduce asexually, offspring are genetically identical to their mothers. However, asexual reproduction is limited to a nonrandom subset of the genotypes in the population. Only females that have a high level of heterozygosity are capable of parthenogenetic reproduction and there is a strong familial influence on the ability to reproduce parthenogenetically. Although the mechanism by which genetic variation facilitates asexual reproduction is unknown, we suggest that heterosis may facilitate the switch from producing haploid meiotic eggs to diploid, essentially mitotic, eggs.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mutation and sex in a competitive worldNature, 2000
- Individual control over reproduction: an underestimated element in the maintenance of sex?Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 1999
- On Sex, Mate Selection and the Red QueenJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1999
- Fitness of alternative modes of reproduction: developmental constraints and the evolutionary maintenance of sexProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 1999
- What’s wrong with a little sex?Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 1999
- Evolutionary Genetics of Life CyclesAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1997
- Is a little bit of sex as good as a lot?Journal of Theoretical Biology, 1995
- Males and the advantage of sexJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1984
- Sex and EvolutionJournal of Animal Ecology, 1975