Surveying Physicians To Determine the Minimal Important Difference
- 1 August 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 52 (8) , 717-723
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(99)00050-5
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessing the minimal important difference in symptoms: A comparison of two techniquesPublished by Elsevier ,1996
- Communicating the Benefits of Chronic Preventive TherapyMedical Decision Making, 1995
- Influence of method of reporting study results on decision of physicians to prescribe drugs to lower cholesterol concentrationBMJ, 1994
- Expansion of aortic aneurysms is reduced by propranolol in a hypertensive rat modelJournal of Vascular Surgery, 1994
- Prescribing propensityJournal of General Internal Medicine, 1994
- The framing effect of relative and absolute riskJournal of General Internal Medicine, 1993
- Measured Enthusiasm: Does the Method of Reporting Trial Results Alter Perceptions of Therapeutic Effectiveness?Annals of Internal Medicine, 1992
- Absolutely relative: How research results are summarized can affect treatment decisionsThe American Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Factors influencing enlargement rate of small abdominal aortic aneurysmsJournal of Surgical Research, 1987
- The Value of Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Abdominal Aortic AneurysmScottish Medical Journal, 1975