No differential attrition was found in randomized controlled trials published in general medical journals: a meta-analysis
- 1 September 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 66 (9) , 948-954
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.03.019
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessing the impact of attrition in randomized controlled trialsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2010
- Outlier and influence diagnostics for meta-analysisResearch Synthesis Methods, 2010
- Meta-Analysis of Dropout Rates in SSRIs Versus Placebo in Randomized Clinical Trials of PTSDJournal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 2010
- Dropout Rates in Randomized Clinical Trials of Antipsychotics: A Meta-analysis Comparing First- and Second-Generation Drugs and an Examination of the Role of Trial Design FeaturesSchizophrenia Bulletin, 2008
- Assessing differential attrition in clinical trials: self-monitoring of oral anticoagulation and type II diabetesBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2007
- Reporting attrition in randomised controlled trialsBMJ, 2006
- Impact of Participant and Physician Intervention Preferences on Randomized TrialsJAMA, 2005
- Evidence for risk of bias in cluster randomised trials: review of recent trials published in three general medical journalsBMJ, 2003
- Sample size slippages in randomised trials: exclusions and the lost and waywardThe Lancet, 2002
- Differential attrition: Another hazard of follow-up research.American Psychologist, 1978