New Test for Penicillin Allergy
- 5 April 1965
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 192 (1) , 36-40
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1965.03080140042010
Abstract
Therese days to recite the frequency and dangers of penicillin-induced allergic reactions. Suffice to say that penicillin has overtaken animal sera as the major cause of anaphylaxis in this country,1 while thousands are denied its antibacterial benefits because of previous adverse reactions. There have been many and varied attempts to devise a reliable way of detecting the development of such allergy in the individual patient. None of these attempts has proved completely satisfactory so far. Skin and ophthalmic tests with penicillin are known to be not only inaccurate but dangerous on occasion; several cases of anaphylaxis and even one fatality have been reported in the literature.2 Hemagglutination titers too often seem merely to indicate previous penicillin administration, and bear little relation to previous or subsequent allergic reactions, though recently deWeck3 has obtained more promising results. Intradermal testing with penicilloyl-poly lysine4 has been a useful advance, althoughKeywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Penicilloyl-Polylysine as an Intradermal Test of Penicillin SensitivityJAMA, 1964
- The Circulating Basophil as an Indicator of Hypersensitivity in ManArchives of Dermatology, 1963
- Antigenic Histamine Release from Passively Sensitized Human LeukocytesScience, 1963
- Indirect Basophil Degranulation Test for Allergy to Penicillin and Other DrugsJAMA, 1963
- SIMPLIFIED MICROMETHOD FOR MEASURING HISTAMINE IN HUMAN PLASMA1963
- Atopic Reagins to Penicillin, Pollens and Seeds: Thermolability, Titer and Persistence in the Skin of Passively Sensitized Macaque MonkeysInternational Archives of Allergy and Immunology, 1963
- HYPERSENSITIVITY TO PENICILLENIC ACID DERIVATIVES IN HUMAN BEINGS WITH PENICILLIN ALLERGYThe Journal of Experimental Medicine, 1962