Audit or research – what is the difference?
- 1 July 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Clinical Nursing
- Vol. 5 (4) , 249-256
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.1996.tb00259.x
Abstract
Audit and research are activities which have some characteristics in common and others which are rather different. This paper presents working definitions of each process and then examines their attributes and interrelationships in some detail. Areas covered include their purposes, what types of process they are, their theoretical bases, the methods used in each, sampling, the use of findings, confidentiality and the time frame of each. If nurses are to use or undertake research and/or audit appropriately in their practice, it is important that the similarities and differences between the two are clear.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Cochrane CollaborationBMJ, 1994
- Action research: a few details, a caution and something newJournal of Advanced Nursing, 1994
- Audit: What is it and why?Current Orthopaedics, 1993
- Qualitative Research: The Evaluation of Its Credibility, Fittingness, and AuditabilityWestern Journal of Nursing Research, 1993
- Medical audit and medical research. Joint conference organised by Northern Regional Health Authority and the University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, September 1992Quality and Safety in Health Care, 1992
- Audit and research.BMJ, 1992
- Developing Flanagan's critical incident technique to elicit indicators of high and low quality nursing care from patients and their nursesJournal of Advanced Nursing, 1992
- Audit: the third clinical science?Quality and Safety in Health Care, 1992
- Action research: philosophy, methods and personal experiencesJournal of Advanced Nursing, 1989