Ethical considerations of clinical use ofMiranda-like warnings
- 1 January 1988
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Psychiatric Quarterly
- Vol. 59 (4) , 293-305
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01064920
Abstract
Psychiatrists and other psychotherapists are not generally required to provideMiranda-like warnings to their patients. Even so, many psychotherapists issue such warnings before encountering clinical situations that frequently arise in general clinical practice and have potential involvement with the legal system. Ethical considerations of whether to utilizeMiranda-like warnings in common clinical situations such as involuntary hospitalization, the duty to warn and protect, and suspected child abuse reporting, are explored.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Confidentiality and the New Duty to Protect: The Therapist's DilemmaPsychiatric Services, 1988
- The Council on Psychiatry and LawAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1988
- Dr. Mills and Colleagues ReplyAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1987
- Conflict of interest between therapist‐patient confidentiality and the duty to report sexual abuse of childrenBehavioral Sciences & the Law, 1987
- Protecting third parties: a decade after TarasoffAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1987
- The right to remain silent during psychiatric examination in civil and criminal cases— A national survey and an analysisInternational Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 1986
- Psychiatric commitment and involuntary hospitalization: An ethical perspectivePsychiatric Quarterly, 1986
- The prediction of violent behavior: toward a second generation of theory and policyAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1984
- A Preference for Liberty: The Case against Involuntary Commitment of the Mentally DisorderedCalifornia Law Review, 1982
- Should the Privilege against Self-Incrimination Apply to Compelled Psychiatric Examinations?Stanford Law Review, 1973