Suppression of genome instability by redundant S-phase checkpoint pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
- 26 March 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Vol. 99 (7) , 4500-4507
- https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.062702199
Abstract
Cancer cells show increased genome rearrangements, although it is unclear what defects cause these rearrangements. Previous studies have implicated the Saccharomyces cerevisiae replication checkpoint in the suppression of spontaneous genome rearrangements. In the present study, low doses of methyl methane sulfonate that activate the intra-S checkpoint but not the G1 or G2 DNA damage checkpoints were found to cause increased accumulation of genome rearrangements in both wild-type strains and to an even greater extent in strains containing mutations causing defects in the intra-S checkpoint. The rearrangements were primarily translocations or events resulting in deletion of a portion of a chromosome arm along with the addition of a new telomere. Combinations of mutations causing individual defects in the RAD24 or SGS1 branches of the intra-S checkpoint or the replication checkpoint showed synergistic interactions with regard to the spontaneous genome instability rate. PDS1 and the RAD50–MRE11–XRS2 complex were found to be important members of all the S-phase checkpoints in suppressing genome instability, whereas RAD53 only seemed to play a role in the intra-S checkpoints. Combinations of mutations that seem to result in inactivation of the S-phase checkpoints and critical effectors resulted in as much as 12,000–14,000-fold increases in the genome instability rate. These data support the view that spontaneous genome rearrangements result from DNA replication errors and indicate that there is a high degree of redundancy among the checkpoints that act in S phase to suppress such genome instability.Keywords
This publication has 86 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rfc4 Interacts with Rpa1 and Is Required for Both DNA Replication and DNA Damage Checkpoints in Saccharomyces cerevisiaeMolecular and Cellular Biology, 2001
- Pds1 phosphorylation in response to DNA damage is essential for its DNA damage checkpoint functionGenes & Development, 2001
- Pif1p Helicase, a Catalytic Inhibitor of Telomerase in YeastScience, 2000
- DNA damage checkpoints and DNA replication controls in Saccharomyces cerevisiaeMutation Research - Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis, 2000
- Review: ATM: the protein encoded by the gene mutated in the radiosensitive syndrome ataxia-telangiectasiaInternational Journal of Radiation Biology, 1999
- Pds1p is required for faithful execution of anaphase in the yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiaeThe Journal of cell biology, 1996
- Spk1/Rad53 is regulated by Mec1-dependent protein phosphorylation in DNA replication and damage checkpoint pathways.Genes & Development, 1996
- Regulation of RAD53 by the ATM -Like Kinases MEC1 and TEL1 in Yeast Cell Cycle Checkpoint PathwaysScience, 1996
- Yeast Checkpoint Genes in DNA Damage Processing: Implications for Repair and ArrestScience, 1995
- Mitotic checkpoint genes in budding yeast and the dependence of mitosis on DNA replication and repair.Genes & Development, 1994