Kinematic and Electromyographic Analysis of Steady Pectoral Fin Swimming in the Surfperches
Open Access
- 15 June 1997
- journal article
- Published by The Company of Biologists in Journal of Experimental Biology
- Vol. 200 (12) , 1709-1723
- https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.200.12.1709
Abstract
The musculoskeletal mechanism of pectoral fin propulsion was investigated in representatives of the two subfamilies of the Embiotocidae (surfperches). Kinematic and electromyographic records of steady swimming by the open-water cruiser Amphistichus rhodoterus and the benthic maneuverer Embiotoca lateralis were compared at 80 % of the species’ respective pectoral–caudal gait transition speeds. Synchronized records of fin movement and the intensity of pectoral muscle activity allowed previous hypotheses of muscle function, based on anatomical lines of action, to be tested. Divisions of the pectoral musculature inserting on the central and trailing-edge fin rays serve simple functions of abduction and adduction. Muscles controlling the fin’s leading edge, by contrast, play more complex roles during the fin stroke, including deceleration of the fin at the downstroke–upstroke transition and rotation of the adducted fin during the non-propulsive period between fin beats. In spite of their phylogenetic and ecological divergence, the surfperches exhibit a number of mechanistic similarities which probably characterize the family. The timings of kinematic events and the maximal excursions of the fin tip, as well as the temporal order of muscle activation and the time to peak activity, are largely conserved. The predominant dorsoventral component of fin movement during the stride is consistent with a lift-based mechanism of propulsion. E. lateralis exhibits a greater anteroposterior range of motion and a more continuous period of fine motor control of the fin than A. rhodoterus, differences which may correspond to the species’ respective capacities for maneuvering. Mechanistic variation in the family is associated with rather minor structural differences (in fin shape and fin base orientation). Owing to the similar functional demands placed on the pectoral fins of many fishes, it is probable that the mechanistic details of embiotociform swimming are widely distributed within the Perciformes.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Use of Gait Transition Speed in Comparative Studies of Fish LocomotionAmerican Zoologist, 1996
- The biology of fish swimmingPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1994
- Avian Forelimb Muscles and Nonsteady Flight: Can Birds Fly without Using the Muscles in Their Wings?The Auk, 1992
- Composition and Mechanics of Routine Swimming of Rainbow Trout,Oncorhynchus mykissCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 1991
- Ontogeny of functional design in tiger salamanders (Ambystoma tigrinum): Are motor patterns conserved during major morphological transformations?Journal of Morphology, 1988
- Simple Physical Principles and Vertebrate Aquatic LocomotionAmerican Zoologist, 1988
- The Role of the Pectoral Fins in Braking of Mackerel, Cod and SaitheNetherlands Journal of Zoology, 1986
- Pectoral Fin Kinematics of Coris Formosa (Teleostei, Labridae)Netherlands Journal of Zoology, 1982
- Influence of pectoral fin shape on thrust and drag in labriform locomotionJournal of Zoology, 1981
- XXI.—The Comparative Myology of the Shoulder Girdle and Pectoral Fin of FishesTransactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 1920