Phimosis: Is circumcision necessary?
- 1 August 1996
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health
- Vol. 32 (4) , 285-289
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1754.1996.tb02554.x
Abstract
Circumcision has been the traditional treatment for phimosis, but now is not the only management option, the best of which appears to be topical steroid application. Importantly, the literature suggests that phimosis probably is over-diagnosed, indicating that a prospective, randomized controlled study is needed to compare the non-circumcision options. Such a study would require consensus on the diagnostic criteria for phimosis; therefore, a more exacting definition would be needed and is suggested. Despite the non-controlled data on medical treatment of true phimosis, there seems little doubt that surgical intervention is not needed for all male infants with adherence of the foreskin to the glans, a non-retractable foreskin or, indeed, true phimosis.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- CircumcisionJournal of Urology, 1996
- TREATMENT OF CHILDHOOD PHIMOSIS WITH TOPICAL STEROIDAnz Journal of Surgery, 1994
- Sutureless circumcisionBritish Journal of Surgery, 1993
- Saving the normal foreskin.BMJ, 1993
- Save the normal foreskin.BMJ, 1993
- CircumcisionClinical Pediatrics, 1992
- Save the prepuce. Painless separation of preputial adhesions in the outpatient clinic.BMJ, 1988
- Circumcision for Phimosis: A Follow-Up StudyScandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, 1986
- CircumcisionClinical Pediatrics, 1983
- Conjoined twins and twin parasite: Clinical analysis of three examplesJournal of Pediatric Surgery, 1969