Sex Bias at Work: The Effects of Attentional and Memory Demands on Performance Ratings of Men and Women1
- 1 December 1991
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Applied Social Psychology
- Vol. 21 (23) , 1939-1960
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1991.tb00515.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 77 references indexed in Scilit:
- The dynamics of implicit theories of group performance: When and how do they operate?Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991
- The effect of performance appraisal salience on recall and ratingsOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1990
- Effect of purpose of observation on accuracy of immediate and delayed performance ratingsOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1989
- Joan McKay versus John McKay: Do gender stereotypes bias evaluations?Psychological Bulletin, 1989
- Exposure to successful women: Antidote to sex discrimination in applicant screening decisions?Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1986
- Biases in the recording of performance-related information: The effects of initial impression and centrality of the appraisal taskOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1986
- The accuracy of leadership ratings: A cognitive categorization perspectiveOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1984
- Consequences of schemata for attention, impressions, and recall in complex social interactions.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983
- Ubiquitous halo.Psychological Bulletin, 1981
- Development of a work behavior taxonomy for first-line supervisors.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1978