Initial experience with Thrombotest
- 1 March 1964
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Clinical Pathology
- Vol. 17 (2) , 182-184
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.17.2.182
Abstract
Patients well controlled by the Quick test are often found to be over-anticoagulated by Thrombotest standards, so the introduction of Thrombotest has led to widespread reductions in dosage. No improvement in stability of control has been noted. The main advantages of Thrombotest seem to be its technical simplicity and the comparability of results obtained in different laboratories.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Control of Anticoagulant Therapy A Comparison of the Thrombotest, the Prothrombin-Proconvertin Method, and the Prothrombin TimeActa Medica Scandinavica, 2009
- Relation between Levels of Plasma Thromboplastin Component (PTC) and Prothrombin Times by the P&P and Quick Methods in Patients Receiving WarfarinNew England Journal of Medicine, 1962
- CONTROL OF ANTICOAGULANT THERAPY - A COMPARISON OF THROMBOTEST, PROTHROMBIN-PROCONVERTIN METHOD, AND PROTHROMBIN TIME1962
- Comparison of the Thrombotest with the One-Stage Prothrombin TimeNew England Journal of Medicine, 1961
- Thrombotest versus One-Stage Prothrombin-Time DeterminationNew England Journal of Medicine, 1961
- THROMBOTEST A NEW METHOD FOR CONTROLLING ANTICOAGULANT THERAPYThe Lancet, 1959
- CHRISTMAS FACTOR IN THROMBOTESTThe Lancet, 1959